Sculpting Transformation / Aron Demetz & Peter Senoner

A talk with the artists from South Tyrol

From Alpine roots to global vision: a talk with two artists from South Tyrol, redefining the connection between Body, Nature, and Technology through their artworks.

Peter Senoner

What does the illusion of the future represent for you? How does your art reflect your thoughts on it?

For me, the future is a psychological construction. It is something we constantly project — shaped by fear, hope, technology, and uncertainty. I don’t see it as a distant time, but as something already unfolding within us.
In my work, the hybrid bodies and evolving figures reflect this condition. They are not futuristic in a science-fiction sense; they are transitional. They embody the tension between what we are and what we are becoming. The “illusion” lies in believing the future is separate from the present, when in reality it grows from within our current state of consciousness.

During your residencies and work abroad, have you adopted specific techniques or ideologies into your practice?

I wouldn’t say I adopted specific techniques in a literal way. What I absorbed were atmospheres and ways of thinking. Every cultural context carries a different understanding of the body, time, and space. In some places, I became more aware of ritual and silence; in others, of structure and architectural precision. These experiences influenced my perception rather than my surface aesthetics. They deepened my understanding of the body as something culturally layered, not just biological, but symbolic.

You were featured in the workshops and meet-ups for Sensoria Dolomites. How did connecting with individuals outside your artistic world influence your process?

This Art Experiences were enriching because it removed art from its protected space. When you engage with people who are not necessarily part of the art world, the dialogue becomes more immediate and human. It challenged me to articulate my thoughts differently, less theoretically, more intuitively. I discovered that vulnerability creates connection. The body, which is central in my work, became a universal meeting point. The boundary between artist and audience softened, and that exchange subtly influenced my sensitivity in the studio.

What guides you in choosing between drawing, sculpture, or digital techniques?

Each medium has its own tempo. Drawing is immediate and almost meditative — it captures the first emergence of an idea. Sculpture is slower and physical; it involves resistance. The material pushes back, and that friction becomes part of the work. Digital techniques allow me to simulate transformation. They offer a certain freedom in exploring morphologies before they solidify into material form. The decision is intuitive but concept-driven. I ask myself: does this idea require weight? Does it need tactility? Or does it demand fluidity and mutation? The medium follows the conceptual necessity.

You constantly develop new bodies and beings. Have you ever encountered “the one” — the ideal form that fully expresses your vision?

No, and I hope I never will. The idea of an ideal form would imply completion. My practice is about becoming, about transformation. Each figure is part of a continuous investigation. If I were to find “the one,” the process would end — and for me, the process is the essence. I am more interested in tension, in fragments, in the unfinished.

Where do you see your personal vision within a venue like Sensoria? How does it align with your artistic argument?

Sensoria situates art within a powerful natural environment. The Dolomites represent geological transformation — pressure, erosion, time. That resonates deeply with my exploration of the human body as something shaped by invisible forces. Both the mountain and the body are monumental yet fragile. They are shaped slowly, often imperceptibly. That parallel feels very meaningful to me.

Can you identify conceptual connections or differences between your practice and that of Aron Demetz?

There is certainly a shared interest in the human figure and transformation. However, our approaches differ in emphasis. Aron Demetz works strongly with material processes like burning, carving, and direct physical intervention. The transformation is often visibly inscribed into the surface. In my work, transformation tends to be more internal, almost evolutionary. I explore mutation and hybridization as psychological and biological metaphors. Where we connect is in vulnerability. Where we differ is in how transformation manifests — through material confrontation in his case, and through morphogenetic speculation in mine.

Aron Demetz

⁠In the stretch of your career you have previously worked as a professor of sculpture and directed the Summer Academy Gardena, what emotions and connections have arisen in comparison to back then, and your recent experience exposing, introducing your practice and your work to the guests of Sensoria?

Teaching at the academy unfolds over five years, and even the Summer Academy, although limited to two weeks, addresses aspiring professionals who arrive with years of training and clearly defined ambitions.
The encounter at Sensoria operates on a different register. During the “Artist for a Day” experience, conceived for the Sensoria Art Edition Days, I observed a genuine willingness to step beyond familiar patterns of thought. The atelier became a temporary threshold, a pause within the rhythm of daily life in which ideas could surface, settle, and take form.
At the same time, Sensoria and Art create a distinct space of encounter. The hotel is not merely a backdrop but a lived environment in which art is experienced beyond the conventions of the gallery or museum. The guest arrives without the institutional distance of a traditional viewer. The mindset is quieter, more permeable, less shaped by expectation and more responsive to nuance.
In this atmosphere, the dialogue with the work shifts. The sculptures are not approached as objects to be analyzed, but as presences within space. Perception becomes less declarative and more intuitive. What emerges is not spectacle but resonance, a measured openness to the unfamiliar and an experience that lingers beyond the immediate moment.

What force has motivated you to share a new perspective of your craft via teaching? As an artist, what have you taken out of this experience and applied to your work?

Working with young people is profoundly inspiring. They perceive things with a freshness and directness that is both honest and demanding. They carry doubts and questions about their path, yet they also give a great deal in return.
For me, teaching has always been a constructive and enriching experience. It is not only about sharing accumulated knowledge, but about walking a path together and understanding what might help a student discover their own direction and make conscious choices. These young people are adults with thoughtful and valid perspectives. With them, one can truly work, exchange, and share a meaningful period of growth.

⁠Do you believe that having been brought up in a natural environment cultivated a sense of patience that eventually has guided you through your artistic endeavors?

Growing up in Val Gardena has undoubtedly shaped the way I work. Had I grown up in another city, my artistic language would certainly have evolved differently. Not everyone is influenced so directly by their surroundings, but for me this connection has always been essential. I have never wished to deny where I come from.
Being aware of the woodcarving tradition means understanding that one must find a new point of entry, a contemporary way of communicating. The means of expression may change, but one’s origins remain present. They cannot, and perhaps should not, be concealed.

In your experimentation with new mediums and techniques in order to fully develop your pieces, what material or process have you found intimidating to approach? Do you usually approach each new medium or technique with confidence?

Intimidation can be a valuable companion, much like fear or uncertainty, a quiet presence that accompanies the creative process. Curiosity and resilience have taught me that these feelings deserve attention rather than avoidance.
Every material carries its own qualities and its own memory. Each responds differently and reveals itself only under certain conditions. It is precisely through this tension that new perspectives emerge and sculpture continues to evolve.

Your art explores the relationship between human and nature, the immersion of living beings together, accompanied by their reaction and adaptation to external factors. How do you connect these principles to the project developed at Sensoria Dolomites?

The relationship between human beings and nature, and the subtle processes of adaptation between the two, lies at the core of my work. I am interested in coexistence, in presence, and in the quiet dialogue between body and environment.
At Sensoria, this approach found a natural resonance. The architecture and guiding philosophy of the house are rooted in attentiveness to landscape and atmosphere. The hotel positions itself within nature rather than in opposition to it.
For this project, the sculptures were conceived as part of a broader spatial composition. They do not dominate their surroundings but engage with light, material, and silence. In this context, the relationship between human and nature is not illustrated but experienced. The guest moves through a setting in which art, architecture, and landscape form a restrained and coherent unity that reflects the essential principles of my practice.

⁠What is your argumentation or reasoning behind the particular sculptures erected in this venue? How does each backdrop or location relate to the piece in itself?

The sculptures chosen for Sensoria emphasize a sense of calm and inwardness, closely connected to nature and to the human figure in contemplation. They invite reflection rather than assertion.
Placed in dialogue with their specific surroundings, each work responds to light, proportion, and atmosphere. They function as subtle mirrors for the guest’s introspection. Those who wish may find themselves reflected within a slightly altered perspective, accompanied by the quiet philosophy of Sensoria.

⁠From an artistic perspective, what middle ground do you share with artist Peter Senoner in order to further work, understand and develop projects in coexistence?

Peter Senoner and I have known each other for many years. I deeply value his artistic sensibility, his professionalism, and his sustained commitment to the art scene of South Tyrol. Our common ground is art itself. Over time, we have exchanged ideas and perspectives, collaborated on exhibitions and projects, and worked together in teaching. During the first two years of my Summer Academy, Peter led a drawing course.
Our collaboration continues to evolve, most recently and currently within the framework of the Sensoria Art Edition, an ongoing dialogue that reflects our shared commitment to creating meaningful artistic contexts.

Your art explores the relationship between human and nature, the immersion of living beings together, accompanied by their reaction and adaptation to external factors. How do you connect these principles to the project developed at Sensoria Dolomites?

The relationship between human beings and nature, and the subtle processes of adaptation between the two, lies at the core of my work. I am interested in coexistence, in presence, and in the quiet dialogue between body and environment. At Sensoria, this approach found a natural resonance. The architecture and guiding philosophy of the house are rooted in attentiveness to landscape and atmosphere. The hotel positions itself within nature rather than in opposition to it. For this project, the sculptures were conceived as part of a broader spatial composition. They do not dominate their surroundings but engage with light, material, and silence. In this context, the relationship between human and nature is not illustrated but experienced. The guest moves through a setting in which art, architecture, and landscape form a restrained and coherent unity that reflects the essential principles of my practice.

⁠What is your argumentation or reasoning behind the particular sculptures erected in this venue? How does each backdrop or location relate to the piece in itself?

The sculptures chosen for Sensoria emphasize a sense of calm and inwardness, closely connected to nature and to the human figure in contemplation. They invite reflection rather than assertion. Placed in dialogue with their specific surroundings, each work responds to light, proportion, and atmosphere. They function as subtle mirrors for the guest’s introspection. Those who wish may find themselves reflected within a slightly altered perspective, accompanied by the quiet philosophy of Sensoria.

⁠From an artistic perspective, what middle ground do you share with artist Peter Senoner in order to further work, understand and develop projects in coexistence?

Peter Senoner and I have known each other for many years. I deeply value his artistic sensibility, his professionalism, and his sustained commitment to the art scene of South Tyrol. Our common ground is art itself. Over time, we have exchanged ideas and perspectives, collaborated on exhibitions and projects, and worked together in teaching. During the first two years of my Summer Academy, Peter led a drawing course. Our collaboration continues to evolve, most recently and currently within the framework of the Sensoria Art Edition, an ongoing dialogue that reflects our shared commitment to creating meaningful artistic contexts.

Sculpting Transformation / Aron Demetz & Peter Senoner

Credits

Artists: Peter Senoner, Aron Demetz  / @peter_senoner @demetzaron
Interview: Ethel Romero / @_bby_ella_

You may also like

Berlin, My Love, My Paradox

Art&Culture | Words
Berlin presents itself as a hub of inclusivity in the fashion industry, but beneath the surface, much of it feels like curated aesthetics and hollow gestures. Through the raw, unfiltered lens of Tiresia—a trans model fighting for real representation and diversity in fashion—the city’s underground spirit feels like it’s fading, trading rebellion for marketable diversity and selling out what made it real in the first place.

Noise and dust / WGT2017

Art&Culture | Spotlight
We descent into the deepest core of the dusk. We took part in the World’s greatest meeting dedicated to electro and gothic subcultures. Photography and report by Marco Giuliano and Anca Macavei from Wave-Gotik-Treffen 2017.