If you had to choose from all your previous work, what’s your favorite installation that feels like the perfect fit for your current show — and why?
Audience (2008) has a special place in our hearts; there’s something about its proportions and movements that convey a sense of human-like character, simply but effectively. This host of small mirrors, mounted on metal feet, will turn to face a visitor in one synchronized gesture that is unmistakably inquisitive, and anthropomorphic despite their undisguised mechanics. And what do you see when they all turn to face you? Yourself. Over and over again. It’s always been poignant, but it becomes ever more so as we increasingly feel the impact of living in an attention economy. Social media becomes more and more of a platform for dialogue with the self. Even working with AI is, currently, to a certain extent, like working with a mirror, albeit an amplified one. Jean Cocteau famously said that mirrors should think longer before they reflect; there’s a sense (if not the one originally intended) where this feels like it’s coming true. Is there a danger of losing ourselves, our own critical thought, while gazing into the thinking mirror of technology? It becomes more the myth of Narcissus than that of Orpheus.
What do art, nature, and technology share in common from your perspective?
Art and technology are human constructs while nature reaches far beyond humanity—and is indeed indifferent to it. But then again, maybe technology is fast on the way to transcending humanity also, perhaps with a comparable indifference. Humans are anything but indifferent, even when jaded, disaffected, or fatigued, we need things to matter. Art is both the pursuit and the expression of meaning. It’s how we try to make sense of the incomprehensible, through symbols, metaphor, narrative, and how we try to grasp at something beyond the finitude of our earthly existence, even whilst knowing this is ultimately impossible. That is inherently human. In the longer term, it’s not entirely unthinkable that art, nature, and technology might converge.
How do you see technology and creativity coming together in your practice? What’s the most vital part of that fusion?
In a sense, they are part of the same thing for us. At the core of every artwork is an idea, and then it’s all about devising the best way to bring that idea to life. The vital part is to do so in a way that is effective and meaningful, whatever the medium or mechanism. The deficiency of technology (in that it often does not do exactly what we envisioned for it) is what sparks creativity, and it’s in this very resistance that we feel at our best.